The new restriction of Apple’s device IDFA for iOS 14 to increase consumer privacy adds another hurdle in how the advertising industry interacts with users.
The new restriction of Apple’s device IDFA for iOS 14 to increase consumer privacy adds another hurdle in how the advertising industry interacts with users.
While the industry seems to be in a bit of an uproar about Apple’s announcement about its privacy initiatives at their Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) this week, I can say with great confidence it comes as little surprise to Kochava. Apple’s news of restricting the availability of the IDFA—the industry’s longtime device identifier for advertisers on iOS—forcing them and related adtech companies to rethink how they measure campaigns and understand user behavior is one of many industry pivots we have seen since the beginning of this year. Apple will now require publishers, advertisers, and related entities to request user permission to track them, among other privacy initiatives protecting consumer data and identity.
We are an ecosystem in transition but fully prepared to work diligently through the changes as we continue to put the privacy of user data at the forefront. As a leading attribution provider and long-standing partner with Apple, our mission aligns with theirs.
In addition to the opt-in prompt for IDFA access, Apple intends to use the SKAdNetwork to inform advertisers about attribution on ads displayed on iOS devices for those publishers that are registered with SKAdNetwork. Marketers will know an install occurred, but they won’t be able to connect a specific install with a specific device, thus preserving privacy. Because the SKAdNetwork was just formally referenced this week, there is no available inventory that is SKAdNetwork ‘ready’ and it’s unclear what will be available and when.
Although this is a major change in an industry increasingly being forced to focus on consumer privacy, the release of Apple’s resettable IDFA and Limit Ad Tracking (LAT) in previous years hinted that it would further restrict outside parties from an addressable identifier for distinct devices.
The announcement comes amidst Google’s countdown to the end of the cookie, and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), so advertisers have already been inundated with major industry changes coming to the mainstream way of marketing, measuring, and retargeting. However, those of us looking ahead at the direction of the industry have been preparing to solve for consumer identity in the absence of traditional device identifiers. For some time now, we’ve been incorporating privacy by design and developing alternative but unique mechanisms for identity and providing tools for user consent.
Kochava is prepared to support the ecosystem through several ongoing innovations. These include providing identity solutions, enabling contextual targeting (where no stable identifiers are used cross-property), and through frameworks like SKAdNetwork and XCHNG. We are working closely with clients, partners, and the ecosystem at-large on several solutions that will allow our clients to have a competitive advantage.
In preparation for the end of the cookie and increased limitation of the IDFA, alternative consumer identity solutions are now more important than ever.
At Kochava, we read the writing on the wall several years ago and began compiling identity solutions that are not reliant on a platform-specific advertising ID. We knew that to perform more effective and reliable attribution and measurement and create a holistic view of the consumer journey, we needed to look beyond the reliance on an IDFA.
Several solutions already exist within Kochava to aid marketers in identifying consumers with the first-party data they have. With respect to the restriction of the IDFA, here is a list of available solutions to maintain consumer privacy and in some cases enhance understanding of audiences.
Kochava’s Identity Solutions help brands connect consumer touchpoints in the absence of device IDs using other user identifiers such as hashed emails to enrich a marketer’s existing dataset with validated first-party data. Through Kochava’s IdentityLink®, marketers can further enrich their first-party data and have a greater understanding of their users with their own identifiers.
Options exist to perform identity resolution using hashed-email-to-device linkages, device connections by household, and other first-party identifiers key in solving for identity resolution and attribution. This is valuable to marketers, publishers, and ecosystem partners and we have tools prepared to enable the ecosystem to leverage their own 1st party data sets and resolve them in actionable ways.
Designed to determine when to request and manage consent, Kochava’s Intelligent Consent Manager, built using the IAB’s CCPA Compliance Framework for Publishers, works in parallel to Apple’s new consumer privacy initiatives.
Paid reengagement campaigns have become a very popular approach for marketers today. This strategy currently relies heavily on device IDs for audience segmentation, activation, and targeting. As an alternative to paid reengagement, marketers can shift to increase their use of owned media outreach via push notifications, in-app messages, email, or SMS. Kochava provides natively integrated engagement capabilities which can help facilitate reengagement for segments where IDFA is not present.
I often say, out of chaos comes opportunity. At Kochava, we see these changes as opportunities to innovate on behalf of our customers, and we are continually building and enhancing our marketing solutions in new ways for them. Kochava was founded because of the need for insight behind advertising campaigns, and since 2011 we have been working to bridge gaps in the industry for marketers. The loss of the IDFA is no exception. We are prepared and poised to continue leading the industry in exciting new directions as we evolve and grow while always putting privacy first.
If you currently use Kochava, we have you covered. Your CSM team can work with you to navigate these changing times.
If you’re a Kochava partner, we have you covered. We have several new initiatives that might make sense to collaborate on together. Please reach out to your Kochava contact, and we can engage in the next steps.
If you aren’t using Kochava, we welcome the opportunity to serve you. We have a history of being a difference-maker for our customers—enabling them to work with crystal clarity in an ecosystem that is filled with opacity.
The post Apple Announcements at WWDC 2020 Challenge Marketers to Tap Alternative Marketing Solutions appeared first on Kochava.
]]>I’m pleased to share the announcement of the Kochava Traffic Index (KTI). Our Data Science team, Product team, and Marketing team have been working together with the leadership of our Client Analytics team over the past year to bring this to life. After reviewing the final product, I couldn’t be more proud of the results! The thoughtful approach, thorough methodology, and rigor to a 360-degree data-driven index are second to none in our industry.
Like any index, it’s important to celebrate the leaders that are in the top rankings. Also, like any index, things can change quarter to quarter, and the index is a function of relative benchmarks against all other media sources that Kochava measures across our tier-1 clients. We believe that having a multi-dimensional view of traffic when indexing media sources create a healthy forcing function for the ecosystem. More publishers with higher volumes of conversions are not serving marketers absent of the principles measured in this index.
The KTI is different from any other benchmark report in the industry in the following important ways:
The Kochava Traffic Index will be published quarterly and our Client Success Managers are equipped with on-demand Index stats intra-quarter for Kochava customers. Because the KTI was built in response to repeated requests by our customers to suggest where to buy, it was important to fully develop a methodology that is consistent with the attributes of what our tier-1 clients desire (versus subjective suggestions based on volumes).
As we prepared and validated the methodology, we had the opportunity to share the results with various partners. In doing this, we developed detailed data reports for all media sources which can be generated on-demand by our Integration team. Examples of the contents of those reports are in the back of the Kochava Traffic Index under “Metrics.” I’m highlighting this specifically as there will be media partners who question their ranking when engaging with customers, and want to understand how it was calculated. We are not acting as a “hidden hand of Kochava” that levies benefits and penalties to particular partners. Instead, we’re making our methodologies clear (because we believe in them and we’re letting the data drive the outcomes. Further, we’re providing the supportive data to any partner that requests it.
We don’t give Facebook, Google and other self-attributing networks (SANs) a free pass. Instead of ranking these networks on equal footing with those media partners that provide clarity of signal and are measured for correlation and fraud, we rank them on a separate index.
Signal clarity is critical as a dimension in media buying (for correlation, transparency, and fraud abatement) and currently, self-attributing networks don’t provide these signals to third-party measurement providers. We believe that marketers must have signal clarity from all partners (despite our collective trust in particular SANs). As such, we compare vendors on equal footing—irrespective of size or orientation as a SAN. We do rank the top five SANs according to the quality metric in their own section of the report.
We believe that the Kochava Traffic Index will provide much-needed insight into how media sources perform so that marketers (regardless of what measurement tools they use) can make better-informed decisions about buying strategies. While this report is available to anyone, we have additional capabilities which further benefit Kochava Customers. We welcome you to make the move to take full advantage of the platform.
Enjoy.
This post has been republished from Charles Manning’s blog on Medium.
The post Kochava Traffic Index (KTI): An Industry Benchmark That is More Than a Proxy to Fraud appeared first on Kochava.
]]>If you follow tech news, I’m sure you saw that linking platform, Branch, acquired TUNE’s mobile attribution client base. We knew this was a possibility as we had been in talks with TUNE as well. To all those TUNE customers whose attribution provider just became a linking platform, I say come see why we’re trusted by some of the biggest brands.
In a recent post on Medium, I’ve published an open letter inviting them to consider our platform. An excerpt of my letter is included below, but you can read the full article here.
On the day after the news that Branch acquired Tune’s mobile attribution business, I wanted to take this opportunity to share insights and history on one of the more peculiar business relationships we have had at Kochava and to highlight ways we have spent the last year to serve select Tune customers.
While Tune has historically been a competitor, the last year has brought interesting opportunities to mutually support the needs of Tune customers. As a bit of history, after Facebook removed Tune from the Facebook MMP Program in February 2014, Tune did an impressive job to minimize churn and convinced many of their customers that they’d be invited back into the program. During that time, Kochava (and other MMP’s) experienced tremendous growth — but there were many customers who remained with Tune along the way. At that same time, we observed further market maturation as advanced measurement providers separated themselves from commodity providers.
At Kochava, we quickly gained a reputation as the company who provided advanced tools for advanced configurable attribution, fractional attribution, fraud abatement and platform-wide feature-rich tools that link all aspects of understanding audience for advertisers.
Despite our good relationship with Tune and the preemptive development work we did to ensure a smooth transition — an acquisition deal wasn’t able to happen. We didn’t buy Tune’s customer contracts, but we would like to earn your business.
The Branch/Tune transaction dictates that a migration of Tune customers off of TMC is inevitable — don’t miss the opportunity to evaluate and choose the best solution rather than accept an inferior toolset without question.
In summary:
Independent measurement is the most important weapon when buying media, and having a toolset that has fidelity to signal is the difference maker for those who are eager to win.
I invite you to take a look and Make the Move.
The post Open Letter to Tune/TMC Customers appeared first on Kochava.
]]>If you’re managing a mobile app or property, you likely fit into one of these categories: 1) you are flying blind and not doing any promotion of your app, 2) you are buying media and flying blind—even worse because you’re spending money, 3) you’re buying media while using an attribution toolset that isn’t meeting your needs, or 4) you’re buying media while using an attribution toolset and feeling confident about how you’re attributing conversions to the right source.
Let’s review. In its most basic form, an attribution tool has two key objectives: to accurately give credit to the right source for a given action, and to record what happened so that there is an ability to audit it later.
Here’s the problem, as I’ve mentioned in previous posts:
The reason for the above statement is multifaceted but essentially rests in the role of configurability in your attribution engine and the role of fraud. Every business has a different mix of media. The rules that determine credit need to be configurable, and Kochava has the greatest level of configurability on the market.
Now for the point of this post: Beyond attribution, the objective is to persist and maintain, as a system of record, the history of attribution.
Is your attribution tool persisting data? Do you know? Have you been told it’s only for 30 days “for privacy and regulatory reasons”? Or, is it for 90 days, and you’re told that the attribution tool has a postback engine so that you can store the attribution history yourself?
Let’s cut to the chase: Companies relying on the Kochava Unified Audience Platform enjoy 15 months of persistence out-of-the-box with the ability to extend longer as they desire. Here are four reasons why persistence is so critical:
As the system of record, an attribution tool must have long-term historical data to provide an independent record of transactions and attribution. Did one click come in before another? Were the attribution rules configured to provide credit for a particular partner because of a tight lookback window on a network or tracker? Did the postback signal get sent? Has a specific device already been attributed? For each of these questions, there must be a definitive answer. With Kochava, all of these transactions are recorded and persisted. Not providing long-term persistence is like using a bank that erases transactions beyond 30 days and says it’s up to you to keep your checkbook balanced. While balancing your checkbook is important, can you imagine being okay with a bank like that?
One of our competitors’ dirty secrets is that by having a short persistence history they can cut costs, and attribution for devices that have already been attributed become candidates for attribution again. This means that your media spend is likely higher than it needs to be simply because the vendor charges on a per attributed install basis and has a specific persistence policy that enables them to generate more revenue. We’ve done the analysis and up to 12% of devices would cross this chasm if they didn’t use Kochava.
Because Kochava holds record-level data across clicks, installs and postbacks sent to partners, it is very easy to re-send data programmatically to ecosystem partners if they missed signals or were unavailable for a given time band. A legitimate system of record should have these facilities because attribution is the centerpiece of the marketing equation.
By purging data at 30 or 90 days, one cannot fully understand trend data. Most trends are mapped by quarter or year-to-year. By providing 15 months out-of-the-box, Kochava customers can be confident in the ability to understand trends regardless of how the data is composed. Pro Tip: a chart showing “count of counts” does not represent long-term persistence. A “count of counts” is a rolled up or aggregated view of events or actions. Our competitors will often point to that and say, “we store data.” However, if you want to organize the data in any other way, you must retain the record-level data so you can build new aggregations or roll-ups as the business needs arise. One simply needs to look at our Funnel tool where marketers can selectively decide what user activity they want to depict and then can actually export device identifiers at each stage. This is out-of-the-box behavior for a tool that is properly supporting visualization of trend data.
Kochava has long been positioned as the most feature-rich attribution platform in the industry. Only the top marketers have historically selected Kochava to be their measurement tool of choice. Indeed, while other companies in attribution tout “market share dominance” because more apps have integrated their SDK, when you look at the apps that spend the most in ad spend, Kochava is the clear market leader.
In each of the four cases above, a marketer could cobble capabilities together by buying other tech and integrating those tools themselves. This increases cost of ownership, increases data debt organizationally and ultimately slows an org down—limiting their agility in making key decisions quickly. In reality, marketers who rely on Kochava for attribution see campaign lift, save money through fraud mitigation and deduped attribution and are increasingly able to get better value out of their media spend due in part to their access to historical, record-level data. No more flying blind. Our customers chart their own paths armed with clear data from the industry’s most configurable tools.
Regardless of where you are in building or promoting your mobile properties, I suggest you consider the importance of data persistence when you select an attribution toolset. While the Kochava Unified Audience Platform is certainly built for market leaders, Kochava offers Free App Analytics®, which provides a starter kit of attribution for emerging advertisers. If cost is your concern, you can start with Free App Analytics® and upgrade to the Unified Audience Platform when the time is right.
Charles Manning is the founder and CEO of Kochava, the leading mobile attribution analytics platform serving tier-one advertisers worldwide. For nearly 20 years, he has been creating technologies that use data for system optimization, ranging from business service management (BSM) to information technology (IT) to attribution analytics. Charles began his career at Oracle and later held executive and C-Level positions at M-Code, Managed Objects, and PLAYXPERT.
The post State of the Industry #6–Attribution and Data Retention: 4 Reasons to Retain Record-Level Data appeared first on Kochava.
]]>When Kochava first started, I was amazed by the potential our tech stack represented. To me, the Kochava system was the centerpiece that 1) collected data that marketers use to track activities and 2) syndicated signals that enabled decisions at scale.
As we’ve grown, this potential has been realized. As our director of product engineering outlined in a previous post (The Business of Real Time), Kochava has 65 ingestion points where we collect data from our SDK, all of which are processed in real time (with a strict FIFO approach), and then sends signals based on rules that our customers configure. We call this end-to-end system Kochava Signals. It doesn’t cost extra, it isn’t an add-on, it’s one of the capabilities customers get when they use Kochava.
This may sound simple, but it’s actually revolutionary. This means that the Kochava SDK is not simply an attribution SDK, Kochava also serves as a data management system—but with no additional cost.
I know what you’re thinking: How is the attribution SDK doubling as a data management SDK? To answer that, let’s look at what a data management SDK needs to do to be successful:
Yep, we’ve got that.
Cross-Platform Support
Let’s start with our footprint. The Kochava SDK can collect data from any of the following, plus a flexible server-to-server model that makes any source accessible.
Traditional App Platforms
App Engine Platforms
Set Top Boxes
Smart TVs
Gaming Consoles
Streaming Sticks
Data Collection
Next, let’s look at instrumentation. The Kochava SDK has all of the things customers want including:
What’s more important is that all of the above instrumentation is configurable on the server. Want to stop measuring ambient analytics? No problem. Want to re-activate an event that you previously disabled? No problem. There is no app update or re-compilation. This is the power of building a properly built technology platform.
So, yes. Kochava can gather anything a customer wants to instrument and we make it configurable.
Data Syndication
Finally, rules and syndication. Kochava customers enjoy access to over 3,000 partner integrations natively built into our platform. Each integration is badged based on supported capabilities. Integrations are largely media related, but we also have non-media integrations like Push, Analytics, DMPs, and many others.
Beyond breadth and depth of integration, our systems have UI-driven command-and-control for each integration.
Want to see what you’re syndicating to a partner, and find out how fast their response times are in absorbing the data? We have that.
Want to see the most recent signals sent to a partner? We can show you that.
Want to collect cost and revenue data from a particular partner? That’s based on a badge and is available directly in our UI.
Want to be in control of what you send to each partner? We can do that. Unlike other data management platforms which have a “send all or send nothing” approach, Kochava puts you in control.
Kochava has an easy user interface to configure each connection, presenting human readable controls based on the integration partner capabilities. Kochava can even direct how many attempts to send signals when the partner is indicating failures in their receipt.
Segmentation and Activation
Beyond the the framework for data management, Kochava provides advanced analytics and activation for any class of data ingested through the platform. This means that data can be processed and understood in the context of segmentation and cohort analysis, and when appropriate, also activated.
In summary, Kochava provides all of the capabilities of a data management SDK without the additional cost of a data management provider, or the added overhead of another SDK. Further, because of the high standard for real-time data ingestion and processing that attribution demands, Kochava has the right infrastructure, processes and service to make data management simple and scalable.
Charles Manning is the founder and CEO of Kochava, the leading mobile attribution analytics platform serving tier-one advertisers worldwide. For nearly 20 years, he has been creating technologies that use data for system optimization, ranging from business service management (BSM) to information technology (IT) to attribution analytics. Charles began his career at Oracle and later held executive and C-Level positions at M-Code, Managed Objects, and PLAYXPERT.
The post State of the Industry #5 – Universal Measurement & Kochava Signals appeared first on Kochava.
]]>The post State of the Industry #3 – Real-Time Fraud Abatement at Scale: Playing the Tape Forward appeared first on Kochava.
]]>Marketers can add bad device IDs, IP addresses and network/site IDs they have encountered to their own Blocklist at the account level in their Fraud Console.
The post State of the Industry #3 – Real-Time Fraud Abatement at Scale: Playing the Tape Forward appeared first on Kochava.
]]>Last week I had the opportunity to share some perspective about how Cheap Attribution Tools Jeopardize Media Efficiency. The post proved timely as just last Friday AdExchanger published an article on how marketers are frustrated with our competitors lackluster offerings. While it was certainly provocative to those who are new to buying media at scale, it’s not new to marketers who really appreciate that a dollar spent in the right tool-set equates to thousands of dollars delivered in efficacy.
Each year, Kochava hosts the Kochava Mobile Summit. An intimate event that takes place at our HQ location of Sandpoint, Idaho, The Summit is filled with topics that are both strategic in nature and granular in tactical assessment. The top marketers in mobile are in attendance and because of our self-imposed attendee limits, it is incredibly potent. In addition to topics led by various customers, we have the opportunity to share our own observations about the industry, illustrating what we’re doing as a company for the coming year. It’s a bit of an “up-front” for measurement.
Since we started Kochava, the driving visual that I’ve used internally with our team, to illustrate what we want to become, is that of a next-generation “Bloomberg Terminal” for digital advertisers. The premise stems from the early days of Bloomberg where the company highlighted that this terminal was the difference maker for traders who were successful vs. those who were not. It was about speed, efficiency, and leveraging the right tools to make the right decisions on each buy and sell. Real-time data, visualization and integration with all trading desks were critical to success.
While the early versions of the Bloomberg Box lacked user experience, the notion was 100% correct, and it was the basis of Bloomberg’s success.
I regularly hear from our customers (marketers) that they have better insights on the audiences of their media sources than the publishers know themselves. These are the publishers own audiences—and the buyers know more than the sellers. This is where we came up with the mantra that Kochava delivers an unfair advantage.
While the Bloomberg vision has always been grand, our execution has been made up of incremental tactical steps leading to that objective. We started with core attribution. We progressed by providing the most configurable attribution in the market. We next provided enterprise analytics, then fraud monitoring and abatement. At the end of 2016, it was clear that calling our platform an “attribution product” was both inaccurate and disingenuous to the holistic offering we provide vs. other commodity single-use attribution tools. It is also the reason why new marketers will see such disparity between our platform (which is ROI based) and that of other attribution tools (which seem to be misaligned to the success of the customer).
Beyond providing additional tools to the marketer—we also added support for web measurement with unique capabilities enabling cross-media (web and mobile) and cross-device attribution and analytics. Marketers tell us they prefer our visualization, our attribution waterfall logic, and our configurability. They prefer our signaling capabilities, reporting capabilities, and APIs. For those reasons, they want to use Kochava as the system of record to unify it all on one platform.
At the Summit, we announced the Unified Audience Platform which is a more accurate representation of what we’re doing in delivering the “Stack” for the marketer. Our platform incorporates all of the market-leading features of the Kochava attribution engine and gives credit to the platform for our support in the workflow of engaging with the stack. When we say workflow, we’re talking about what we call “The 5 Points of the Star” which are: Plan, Target, Activate, Measure, Optimize.
At the same time as we’re highlighting the Unified Audience Platform, Eric Seufert (Mobile Dev Memo) put together a great summary to help marketers appreciate that there are multiple ingredients for a user acquisition stack.
In his summary, he highlights that marketers need to understand the pieces and parts and discover the proper build/buy matrix for the components involved. The following is a graphic he put together, and it’s a great demonstration that we’re not alone in thinking of “full stack” solution capabilities vs. commodity attribution delivery.
For each part of the stack, I’ve linked how the Unified Audience Platform is a full implementation of it with flexible integration approaches enabling your own in-house toolset as needed (if you have them already). Further, I’ve outlined a technical Lego-block format of how our architecture uniquely positions Kochava as the standard for measurement.
The following is a depiction of the Kochava Unified Audience Platform. It illustrates the transformation capabilities that we support (in real time) from data ingestion through configurable attribution to normalization and object model flexibility for visualization.
The beauty of Kochava and our enterprise-grade platform is that you don’t have to start with a cheap vendor first. You can start with Free App Analytics®. When you’re ready to upgrade, you don’t have to change your SDK. If you’re ready to leverage an enterprise platform today, jump right into the Unified Audience Platform, the measurement standard for marketers.
Charles Manning is the founder and CEO of Kochava, the leading mobile attribution analytics platform serving tier-one advertisers worldwide. For nearly 20 years, he has been creating technologies that use data for system optimization, ranging from business service management (BSM) to information technology (IT) to attribution analytics. Charles began his career at Oracle and later held executive and C-Level positions at M-Code, Managed Objects, and PLAYXPERT.
The post State of the Industry #2 – Kochava: The Unified Audience Platform appeared first on Kochava.
]]>Our competitors, because of the absence of compelling measurement features and a full stack offering, are competing on price alone. They are unashamed in their attempt to commoditize their own business. They’ve raised large sums of money to subsidize the infrastructure cost, and they deliver a second-rate service all under the premise that the opportunity to win in the attribution game is a “land grab” to get developers to integrate their SDK. They augment this effort with a marketing message that attempts to pacify the industry with the belief that there are no special secrets behind attribution.
I disagree.
This trend started a couple years ago and really took shape in 2016. The reason? I believe it’s multi-faceted:
These factors have created a petri dish of chemistry in the market, enabling vendors with limited functionality to provide a cheap solution and find success along the way. If you look a bit deeper, there is a ceiling of capabilities that limit the marketer’s capacity to do what they were sold on in the first place—accurate media attribution and audience measurement.
Every mobile marketer I know started by doing something other than mobile marketing. Everyone had to learn the dynamics of how mobile is unique, what the difference is between incent and non-incent traffic, the notion of re-brokering or the value of analysis by site or subsite identifier. The point is: There is an overwhelming amount of information a marketer new to the industry needs to learn and experience. They haven’t endured the pain and haven’t learned through maturity about what is needed to achieve success. Meanwhile, the marketers who have topped the charts over the last two years have perfected their craft, and they have maintained their position for a reason. What is a new marketer to do?
Everyone says that step 1 is finding an attribution partner. I agree—but the difference maker is in finding the right attribution partner.
For a new marketer, the qualifying questions to select an attribution partner are:
These questions set a low bar and yet, you see how price wins out when the requirements are so limited.
For an increasingly progressive mobile marketer, the questions start to accumulate:
For every question, there is a pain associated with it. The customer (or their team) has experienced pain from lack of insight, understanding, and/or the ability to scale based on the absence of signals that matter to them.
Here is when feature comparison charts start to do a disservice to a new mobile marketer. For them, the desire is to have a clear-cut summary on what is important, what is not and then stack-rank on price. A typical feature comparison from any of our competitors attempts to include the above features in a limited capacity—and highlight that all vendors are generally comparable with price as the deciding factor. The reality is that these features are table stakes.
Of course, no one wants to spend more than they have to on anything (including measurement)! What is not clear to the new mobile marketer is that by stack-ranking on price, they are about to make the most costly mistake in their mobile marketing endeavor. Attribution and measurement costs pale in comparison to media costs when it is measured inaccurately or the system lacks key signals for measurement and optimization. Further, the lack of features for planning, targeting and activation limit the marketer in how they can scale their efforts.
Kochava provides the table stakes mentioned above—but also enables growth beyond the basics. The following are just a few examples:
If confronted with all of the knobs and switches that any marketer should worry about having in their measurement tool—a new mobile marketer will think that the tool providing such capabilities is complicated and overly complex. Mobile is not a black box, and marketers must have key features to measure and control the signals of the user acquisition funnel in order to apply their media dollars efficiently. Without the right tools, the marketer is being penny-wise and pound foolish. Before you take my word for it, let me outline a few examples of what marketers confront on a daily basis when they don’t use Kochava tools:
The cheap attribution tools out there charge on a per attributed install basis. This, at face value, appears as a good deal. It caters to the performance marketer in all of us. The vendor doesn’t get paid unless an attribution is made. We have heard these vendors evangelize that Kochava rips off customers because we charge for impressions, clicks and post-install events. In contrast, they claim to only charge per attribution so they are only being paid when they do their job. Here is the problem with that logic. They are essentially saying that:
The last point drives home the difference between Kochava and the competition. Wonder why these other cheaper vendors don’t give the kind of granular control over your media attribution logic? It’s because they don’t get paid. Wonder why they re-attribute previously attributed installs after their retention window (typically 90 days)? It’s because they get to charge for the attribution repeatedly.
This past week, MediaPost summarized a survey done by AdRoll based on a State of the Industry report. Of note in the survey, 60% of the respondents plan to change their attribution strategy in 2017 from a traditional first- or last-click model. The cheap attribution tools are not only ill-equipped to handle such a feature (Kochava is the only one that supports this today)—their business models are in direct opposition to the approach.
We are already seeing the maturation happen. It’s now a question of how quickly. In a recent post on LinkedIn by Kabeer Chaudhary, Director of M&C Saatchi Mobile APAC, he rebukes a vendor who has created a performance leaderboard by media source without taking into account the impact of fraud in the rankings. This is a distinction that Kochava makes for its customers. A leader of a major mobile agency actively highlighting this problem in public is a clear indication that the industry is undergoing change.
Recently, as more marketers switch to Kochava from other vendors, we learned that one competing attribution tool charges a large fee to pull data out of the toolset to migrate to Kochava (a marketer would do this to avoid double attribution upon conversion to Kochava). To avoid churn, this vendor intentionally makes it difficult for customers to leave via limited tools and new surcharges. A marketer makes an investment when they wire their infrastructure around a measurement platform. How well do you trust a cheaper vendor who knows that they can make you dependent and holds you hostage if you want to leave?
This is the fundamental behavior of the companies who are, as a business strategy, raising money to subsidize the distribution of their SDK and actively convincing marketers to become dependent on their infrastructure only to change the total cost of ownership (TCO) equation over time.
Consider this when thinking about what provides real TCO vs cheap attribution at face-value.
We have been talking about our 1% challenge for the past several years but recently it has been receiving more attention. The reason is that enough marketers new to mobile have been using cheap attribution tools and are left wanting more. While they initially made the decision based on price, they now realize the TCO of measurement with a proper toolset.
The 1% challenge centers on the thesis that the Kochava service is effectively free if we can make a marketer’s ad budget at a minimum 1% more effective than before using our tools. This is because Kochava essentially costs 1% of a marketer’s media spend—but we charge based on the signals that we receive and the capabilities we enable for marketers. While we typically cost approximately 1%, we consistently see that Kochava delivers 5% to 7% or more in improved efficiency over other tools (and more when no tools were used at all). Delivering a return on investment (ROI) five times greater than Kochava cost in the first month isn’t bad either.
A marketer, by definition, is one part creative, one part analyst. If there is any person within an organization that should appreciate the value of ROI, it’s the buyer of an attribution tool! While this is true, one must recognize that the maturity of a growth team dictates the needs of the tools they use. For this reason, we have put together various packages that cater to marketers and upper management alike and meet them where they’re at in the maturity curve.
Marketers are not alone in having to select the right tool. Invariably, management or a CFO needs to sign-off on the prevailing toolset. It’s critical that marketers not only understand the power of selecting the right measurement tool—they must also articulate the ROI to the rest of the management team in the context of the economics against media spend.
If you are in a situation where you need to learn because you don’t know what you don’t know—I suggest you use our Free App Analytics®. Free App Analytics® is a limited feature version of Kochava that is available for free and was specifically created to help emerging marketers learn and upgrade at any time to either our Attribution Analytics package or our Unified Audience Platform (Enterprise Edition). By using Free App Analytics®, you can learn and avoid the pitfalls suffered by so many other marketers who selected the cheaper tools they ultimately had to move away from. You don’t have to believe the lie that cheap is your only option.
While Kochava provides the best ROI, I invite you to test our tools and learn what you need with Free App Analytics®.
Charles Manning is the founder and CEO of Kochava, the leading mobile attribution analytics platform serving tier-one advertisers worldwide. For nearly 20 years, he has been creating technologies that use data for system optimization, ranging from business service management (BSM) to information technology (IT) to attribution analytics. Charles began his career at Oracle and later held executive and C-Level positions at M-Code, Managed Objects, and PLAYXPERT.
The post State of the Industry #1 – Cheap Attribution Tools Jeopardize Media Efficiency—Penny-Wise and Pound-Foolish appeared first on Kochava.
]]>